Psych History

Question Answer
Ruling out rival hypotheses need to consider alternative hypotheses
Falsifiabliity for a claim to be meaningful it must be capable of being disproved
Extraordinary claims require extra evidence
Critical Thinking set of skills for evaluating all claims in an open-minded and careful fashion
Hindsight Bias "i knew it all along"
Availability "off the top of my head" estimating the likelihood of an occurance based on the ease with which it comes to our minds
Base Rate how common a characteristic or behavior is in the general population
Representativeness "like goes with like"
Correlation is not Causation just b/c you have a relationship, one may not cause the other
Ruling out Rival Hypotheses need to consider alternative hypotheses, cannot have biases
Replicability findings must be able to be duplicated, ideally by indpendent investigators, we work as a team, must be able to expand on it
Occam’s Razor simplest explanation is the best one- don’t have evidence for both easier to go with simplier answer
Falsifiablity for a claim to be meaningful it must be capable of being disproved (likely one hypothesis or another can come out of a study)
Critical Thinking set of skills for evaluatig all claims in an open minded and careful fashion
Simulation Heuristic Relies on the ease of constructing hypothetical scenarios or alternative outcomes
Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic (1) When facing an ambiguous condition, people use an anchor to guess
Overconfidence endency to overestimate our abiity to make correct predictions
Hindsight Bias tendency to overestimate how well we could ahve successfully forcasted
Base Rate how commone a characteristic or behavior is in the general population
Heuristics mental shortcuts which can lead to erors
Not me Fallacy believing we're immune of thinking others have errors
Eithor or Fallacy framing a question as one or another
Bandwagon Fallacy assuming that a claim is right because a lot of people believe in it
Emotional Reasoning Fallacy error of using our emotions to evalute the validity of the claim
Oberg's Dictum premise that we should keep an open mind, but we must still think scientifically
Confirmation Bias endency to seek out evidence that spports our hypotehsis and neglect ordistort contradicting evidence
Long Running Debates Mind-Body Debate, Free Will Determination, Nature vs Nurture
Evolutionary Psych attempts to explain psychological raits such as memory, preception or language
Cognitivism can't fully understand the black box by looking at the inputs and the outputs, different aspects of ppls lives will interact differently
Humanism Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow.ppl pocess inner resources for personal growth and strive towards that growth
Behaviorism watson and Skinner, black box view, very objective
Psychoanalysis sigmund freud, internal psychological processes, impulses, thoughts, memories
Gestalt Psychology the whole is different than the sum of its parts
Functionalism influenced by darwins, how has our behavior worked to support that of our ancesters
Structuralism map elements of consciousness using interspection, Wudnt
35 cards - created jul 29, 10:36am

groups

  1. None

category

none
share on facebook download csv