Log In
Sign Up
Practice Test
: Rachels and Plato- PHIL 301
Sorry, you won't be able to do this because your browser does not support JavaScript, or it is turned off.
F
0%
You got
0
out of
0
questions correct.
Review your answers ↓
Matching
skip
applied ethics
normative ethics
Rachels, Point 5
divine command theory
descriptive/comparative ethics
Rachels, Point 2
Conclusion of Cultural Relativism/Rachels
examines what people believe about morality
examines theories that give rise to standards for evaluating conduct
objective moral standards come from GOD
applies moral theories and principles to concrete moral issues, like euthanasia
what is morally right can not be determinded by social norms since we recognize social norms can be socially wrong
there are objective moral standards
since individuals can belong to cultures with conflicting values the same action might be viewed as both morally right and morally wrong
Short Answer
skip
What is Justice (republic)?
metaethics
3 classes of an ideal state
meritocracy
3 virtues of an ideal state
Multiple Choice
skip
extrinsically/instrumentally good
valued for its results alone (getting wisdom teeth pulled)
if cultural relativism is true, then this produces moral progress
examines theories that give rise to standards for evaluating conduct
someone who puts the interests of the states first
(1) we need each other (2) each person should have a designated job. (3) living well is a crucial part of human existence (4) desires are infinite, needs are finite
3 classifications of good (republic)
there are objective moral standards
intrinsically good, extrinsically good, both (knowledge, justice)
something desirable
(1) the nature of justice is a social contract. (2) no one is willingly just. (3) It is better to be unjust than just
examines theories that give rise to standards for evaluating conduct
Rachels, Point 1
since individuals can belong to cultures with conflicting values the same action might be viewed as both morally right and morally wrong
an agreement between people
differnet cultures have different moral codes, therefore there are no objective moral standards
attempts to examine the metaphysical, epistemological, psychological and semantic presumptions of morality
cultural differences are invalid, if cultural relativism is true then there can be no grounds for critisizing other cultures
an action is just if it....
since individuals can belong to cultures with conflicting values the same action might be viewed as both morally right and morally wrong
(1) we need each other (2) each person should have a designated job. (3) living well is a crucial part of human existence (4) desires are infinite, needs are finite
(1) wisdom (2) courage (3) moderation
since individuals can belong to cultures with conflicting values the same action might be viewed as both morally right and morally wrong
promotes harmony to the soul
why do we have cities (republic)?
promotes harmony to the soul
valued for itself; simple pleasures like the sunset
applies moral theories and principles to concrete moral issues, like euthanasia
justice is fantasy, no one would choose justice over injustice, justice is in the interest of the stranger
(1) we need each other (2) each person should have a designated job. (3) living well is a crucial part of human existence (4) desires are infinite, needs are finite
True or False
skip
Rachels, Point 4
if cultural relativism is true, then this produces moral progress
True
False
intrinsically good
objective moral standards come from GOD
True
False
Thrasymachus (republic)
(1) wisdom (2) courage (3) moderation
True
False
virtues of the individual soul
(1) wisdom (2) courage (3) moderation
True
False
how does one become virtuous? (republic)
if you take morality as a mode of action, you become that
True
False
Grade Me!
Log in
to save your scores.